← All issues

Behind the System 006 · October 5, 2026 · 7 min read

Starbucks Made Ordering Easier. That Made the Work Harder.


I don’t drink coffee.

I usually tell people, “I haven’t grown up yet.”

Never had a sip. Not one.

But my wife drinks coffee, so Starbucks still finds a way into my life.

Recently, we were killing time while our son was at football practice. We stopped at Starbucks. She ordered a drink. I ordered a cookie and asked for it to be warmed up.

Nothing complicated.

No seven-step drink.

No “half this, extra that, upside down, two pumps, light ice” situation.

Just a cookie.

We sat down and waited.

And waited.

At some point, it had been close to fifteen minutes. I started doing that thing where you don’t want to be rude, but you start looking around like, “Did we disappear?”

The drive-thru was moving. Orders were being made. People behind the counter were working. It was not one of those moments where you think nobody cares.

That is what made it interesting.

There was activity everywhere.

But somehow, our simple order felt lost inside all of it.

Eventually, we had to go stand closer to the counter. Not exactly to complain. More like to make ourselves visible again.

Like, “Hey, remember us? We were here too.”

Then the cookie came.

Cold.

Now, I know this is not the biggest tragedy in the world. I survived. My family survived. The cookie and I are still working through some things, but we’re going to be okay.

But that little moment stayed with me because the issue was not really the cookie.

The task got completed.

The experience did not.

The point was not just to hand me a cookie. The point was to hand me the warmed cookie I ordered while it was still warm.

What The Cold Cookie Revealed

The cookie showed the difference between completion and outcome.

The order was completed.

But the promise was not.

That is where many systems break. They track whether the task was done, but not whether the intended experience survived the path.

A warmed cookie that arrives cold is not really a warmed cookie.

A lead that gets captured but receives the wrong follow-up is not really a qualified lead.

A customer request that gets logged but never owned is not really handled.

A program signup that sits for six days is not really momentum.

The question is not just, “Did the work get done?”

The better question is, “Did the work arrive in the condition the customer expected?”

That is the layer most dashboards miss.


Field Note #002: A system can mark the task complete while the customer knows the experience was missed. If the condition changed before it reached the customer, the work was not truly complete.

When Convenience Creates Pressure

That is where Starbucks becomes an interesting business lesson.

From the outside, the easy thing to say is, “Starbucks has a wait-time problem.”

Maybe.

But I think that is only the visible part.

The deeper issue is this:

Starbucks made ordering easier.

That made the work harder.

Customers can now enter the Starbucks system through more doors than ever.

You can walk inside and order. You can go through the drive-thru. You can order through the app. You can order for pickup. You can order through delivery. You can customize almost anything.

From the customer’s side, this feels like convenience.

From the store’s side, that is work entering from multiple directions at the same time.

And every new entry point creates pressure somewhere.

Field Note #001: More ways to enter means more work to carry. Before adding another app, form, chatbot, booking link, or ordering path, follow what happens after the request enters the business.

A drink takes a little longer.

A cookie sits too long.

A mobile order is ready before the person arrives.

A customer standing in the store watches orders move around them but does not know where they are in the sequence.

An employee has to balance the person in front of them with the person in the drive-thru with the person who ordered ten minutes ago through the app.

None of those things may look huge by themselves.

But leaks do not stay small when the system keeps getting pressurized.

Eventually, the leak becomes the experience.

The customer expects confusion.

The employee works in survival mode.

The manager manages congestion instead of leading the store.

The brand starts feeling less personal, even if the product is still selling.


The Business Lesson Behind The Counter

That is why this is bigger than coffee.

And to Starbucks’ credit, they seem to recognize that something underneath the customer experience has to change.

Public reporting has covered CEO Brian Niccol’s push to get orders completed within four minutes, along with efforts to simplify the menu, improve staffing, and address bottlenecks inside the store.

Reuters has also reported that Starbucks has been looking at better ways to sequence mobile orders because those orders were flooding in faster than customers arrived, making it harder for baristas to protect the in-store experience.

That part matters.

Because the lazy answer would be, “Tell the employees to move faster.”

But speed alone will not fix a system receiving work from too many directions without a clear enough way to absorb it.

The better question is not only:

“How do we make the drink faster?”

The better question is:

“How does the work enter, where does it wait, who owns the next move, and can the store actually deliver the promise the customer thinks was made?”

That is the part every business should pay attention to.


What This Means For AI And Automation

Because Starbucks is not the only company dealing with this.

A lot of businesses are creating new entry points right now.

Online forms.

Booking links.

Customer portals.

Text requests.

AI chatbots.

Automated lead qualification.

Self-service options.

Apps.

Faster ways to ask for something.

Most of those things sound good.

They make the front door easier.

But a better front door is only better if the business is ready for what enters.

A chatbot can qualify a lead.

Great.

Then what?

Who owns the lead?

Where does the context go?

Does the team know how that person entered?

Does a cold lead get treated the same as a referral?

Does a returning client get treated like a stranger?

That part matters because not every customer enters with the same relationship.

A referral enters with borrowed trust.

A previous client enters with history.

A cold lead enters with curiosity, uncertainty, or maybe skepticism.

Those are not the same.

But when companies add technology too quickly, they can accidentally treat them the same.

On paper, they are all leads.

In real life, they are very different people walking through very different doors.

Field Note #003: referral, returning client, and cold lead may all enter the same pipeline, but they do not carry the same trust, history, or expectation. Automation should preserve context, not flatten the relationship.

And if the business does not design what happens next, the technology may create a smoother beginning and a weaker experience.

That is what Starbucks helps us see.

The issue is not that mobile ordering is bad.

The issue is not that drive-thrus are bad.

The issue is not that customers should stop wanting convenience.

The issue is that every new way for work to enter the business changes the business.

It changes timing.

It changes staffing.

It changes visibility.

It changes priority.

It changes what employees are asked to carry.

And if the company is not careful, it changes the culture.

Because culture is not only what you say in the mission statement.

Culture is also what the daily system forces people to become.

If the system constantly forces employees to rush, recover, apologize, search, remember, and keep up with work entering from every direction, then the culture slowly becomes survival.

Even if the company still talks about connection.

Even if the company still cares about experience.

Even if the people inside the company are trying hard.

The Question Leaders Should Ask

That is why businesses should not only ask whether a new technology makes things easier for the customer.

They should also ask whether it makes the work clearer for the people responsible for delivering the experience.

Before adding another entry point, ask:

Where does this work go after it enters?

Who owns the next move?

What information travels with it?

What expectation did we create for the customer?

Can the team actually deliver that expectation?

Does this new system protect the experience we are known for, or does it quietly pull us away from it?

The goal is not just to make it easier for work to enter the business.

The goal is to make sure the business can carry that work without losing the thing people came for in the first place.

Because when the work enters faster than the system can move it, small things start to happen.

A customer waits too long.

An employee gets overwhelmed.

A manager starts chasing.

A promise gets missed.

A warm cookie becomes a cold one.

And yes, it is just a cookie.

But sometimes the cookie tells you more than the dashboard.

The dashboard may say the order was completed.

The customer knows the experience was not.

— Touré


P.S. If this made you think about the way work enters your own business, that is the point. Before you add another form, funnel, chatbot, or automation, make sure the path behind it can actually carry the promise.

That is the kind of work we unpack inside Behind The System.

Get the next one in your inbox.

One real business, taken apart every week. Just your email. Leave any time.

Comments

Newest first
0/2000

Loading comments...

Keep reading

See all issues →

From the article library

Seeing your own business in one of these? Book a free 30 minute call.